UCP has developed a comprehensive, one-stop shop of resources for every U.S. state and territory. Never scour the Web again for bits and pieces of disability information and resources from disparate sources!
That second sentence jumps out at me – it prompts me – every time I see
it. Invariably it causes me to think of knowledge stocks and knowledge flows,
and the central roles the two play in the meditations of John Seely Brown, et. al.
One of that bunch's biggest ideas goes like this:
It used to be that organizations could win by: (1) knowing valuable stuff, and (2) extracting value from -- while simultaneously restricting access to -- what they knew. Nowadays, however,
that approach isn’t cutting it. Why not? Mostly because “in a world changing at
an increasingly rapid pace, the half-life of these stocks of knowledge is
depleting at an equally rapid pace.”
The new way to make it as an organization
is to shift the primary focus to flows of new knowledge.
“It’s no longer about what you know,” they say, “but rather, what relationships you have and what you can learn from these relationships.”
“It’s no longer about what you know,” they say, “but rather, what relationships you have and what you can learn from these relationships.”
UCP was founded in 1949, when the older ways had just begun to hold sway. Obviously, the organization has evolved over the years. (Witness its ongoing efforts to keep up with changes in information
technologies.) Are its mindsets and practices, however, all the way up to today’s speed? That’s the
sort of thing I want to delve into in this sub-section.
Additionally, I’d like to know:
Additionally, I’d like to know:
- In what ways is UCP organized around the notion that value comes from protecting and capitalizing on existing stocks of knowledge?
- How and where is it participating in flows of new knowledge?
- How might it stand to gain by implementing JSB’s ideas?
- Is there a systematic way to go about doing that?
You may have noticed that I
haven’t been mentioning Red Treehouse. Reason being? At some point herein I want to zero in specifically on UCP’s
Public Education & Outreach (PE&O) offerings. In my opinion, those are similar enough to (all of) Red
Treehouse’s offerings that, if anything useful comes of the zeroing in, both organizations
will be served.
*what we know at any particular time
No comments:
Post a Comment